Under the common law test, which of the following is NOT a relevant evidence category?

The correct answer, indicating that "duration of employment" is not a relevant evidence category under the common law test, stems from the primary considerations that define the relationship between a worker and a business. The common law test focuses on the degree of control exerted by the employer over the worker and the nature of the relationship.

Behavioral control is significant because it assesses how much the employer directs how the worker performs tasks. This includes instructions on when, where, and how work is done, which is critical for establishing the level of independence of the worker.

Financial control looks at whether the employer has the right to control the economic aspects of the worker’s job, including how the worker is paid, whether expenses are reimbursed, and the opportunity for profit or loss. This aspect helps determine if the worker is more like a business entity rather than an employee.

The location of work is also pertinent because it can indicate the level of control an employer has over the work performed. If the employer requires the worker to work at a specific location, this demonstrates a higher degree of control.

In contrast, the duration of employment does not factor into these primary evidence categories used to assess the nature of the working relationship. Duration relates more to the length of time a worker has